Verified Document

Disagree With Nietzsche's View On Morality Essay

Fear Morality Fear and Morality in Nietzsche

Nietzsche believed that there was no real ethic and that since there was no moral without fear, that there were no true morals. The problem with this is how he developed this idea. This paper first breaks down how Nietzsche theorized morality, and then gives two cases to refute his assertions.

Nietzsche's Theory of Morality

From the beginning of his diatribe, Nietzsche shows that he has had a superior intellect from the time he was very young, and he is thus, the supposition has to be, uniquely qualified to judge ethics and morality. He wrote his very first treatise on morality at the "tender" age of thirteen (Nietzsche 1). His views of ethics were shaped by his method of questioning, determining answers, and then building more questions based on these answers, until, he says, "at last I had my own country, my own soil, a totally secluded, flowering, blooming world, a secret garden" (Nietzsche 1). Out of this secluded world he built the frame for his beliefs concerning ethics.

This is not to say that everything that Nietzsche said was wrong. His basic stance is that of "the victor makes the history." He believed that there was no ethic, no morality and no truly discernible good because these had all been determined by the ruling and intellectual, the aristocratic, class. Ethics were the ones set up by those who ruled, so, of course, they would set the ethic as one in which they were right in their actions rather than what is truly, universally thought of as good. His argument can even be...

It is possibly a skewed stance, but it is one that has been popular.
From a reading of Nietzsche's views, to be found in "On the Genealogy of Morals," it is apparent that he does not believe that true morals, or what pass for morals in humanity, are as a result of fear. He believes that this fear does come from the poor being downtrodden by the rich and powerful for many centuries (he makes special mention of the Jews -- contemptuously), but, in general, he lays this tendency to believe that "good" people perform their works out of fear, at the feet of religion (Nietzsche 5). He says that people are fearful of God and thus they do what He would consider good works because they fear some type of metaphysical reprisal. Nietzsche had already said, in the Preface, that he "gave that honor to God, as is reasonable, and made him the father of evil," meaning that in his childish, or more accurately teenage, mind he believed that it could be shown that God was the father of evil and thus to be feared (Nietzsche 1). Because of this fear of a higher being, people, who want to aspire to something better than their life on Earth is, started to obey the morals and the ethic that they found in the Bible. Like Hume, Nietzsche believed that people were not good inherently. This goodness was something that was learned, and that it was scared into them from the time that they were children. Given that Nietzsche was of German ancestry, it…

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Cline, Austin. "Fear, Morality and Crime." About Agnosticism/Atheism, 2010. Web.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. "On the Genealogy of Morals: A Polemic Tract." 2009. Web.

Pillay, Srini. "Fear and the Biological Non-Existence of Morality: Why are we Tortured by our Brains?" Psychology Today, 2010. Web.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Nietzsche's Lack of Cultural Relativism
Words: 598 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Oh this insane sad beast man!" (Nietzsche, 1288). This clearly demonstrates more than simply a sheer intolerance for the beliefs of other people but a profound disrespect which orbits around a sense of mockery and derision. Cultural relativism doesn't offer such criticism and profound judgement for other cultures such as this. While certain cultural relativists might disagree with the beliefs or practices of members of other cultures, there absolutely wouldn't be

Friedrich Nietzsche
Words: 680 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Nietzsche's philosophy of nobility, and why the noble person must be aggressive in order to be successful. Criticize this philosophy by developing a scenario where it would fail in the human services workplace. Only the strong shall survive." "You're fired." In today's business climate, it is both popular and attractive on a visceral level to think that aggression rather than compassion is the best philosophy for a human being to

Plato the Failure of Rationalism:
Words: 1246 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

and, through the scientific study of modern, cognitive science, the idea that 'I' am doing the thinking in a way that is separate from my body and that this can be rationally deducted, simply by thinking and without scientific experimentation would be confounded. However, those using empiricism as their main philosophical view of the world have also been able to twist the empiricism to use science's supposed rationalism and objectivity

Existence of God the Philosophical Questions I
Words: 2843 Length: 8 Document Type: Essay

Existence of God The philosophical questions I will try to answer and why they are of particular interest to me. Opinions that ordinary people tend to have on the issue The great monotheistic religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam profoundly influenced Western philosophy. In all of these religions, the existence of God is a central claim. For nearly a millennium from 500 S.D to about 1500 A.D., Western philosophy was the handmaiden

Role of Islam As a Unifying Force
Words: 4109 Length: 14 Document Type: Term Paper

role of Islam as a unifying force Perhaps more than any other religion in the world, Islam has put to work its less obvious sense in order to unify the peoples sharing the same belief. Through its art, its common language and its judicial system that has the Koran teachings at its base, Islam was a unifying force among the Arabic peoples of the Arabic Peninsula, Northern Africa and the

Existentialism and Virtue Ethics Existentialism
Words: 883 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

The three approaches to ethics today involve whether one does good out of (1) the need to maximize the well-being of the human race, (2) the need to live according to a moral rule ("Do unto others as you would have others do unto you") or (3) the belief that helping people is charitable and benevolent (virtue ethics). The Virtue Ethicists' central concepts are virtue, practical wisdom and eudaimonia. A

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now